How environment influences AI model behavior over explicit instructions
Core Idea: An LLM's behavior is predominantly shaped by its training, context window, and the codebase it's working with, often overriding explicit instructions when these influences conflict.
Key Elements
- Inspired by the management principle that organizational culture determines execution success
- LLMs operate in a "latent space" influenced by multiple factors:
- Fine-tuning and training data
- System prompt
- Context window contents (especially code samples)
- Existing codebase patterns
- These environmental factors create self-reinforcing patterns
- Models continue using libraries and patterns present in context
- Absent examples rarely emerge in generated code
- Code style tends to match existing codebase
Influencing Model Behavior
- Modify the "culture" to change model outputs
- Update Cursor rules or system prompts (limited effect)
- Refactor existing code to follow desired patterns (stronger effect)
- Recognize that codebase patterns typically dominate prompt instructions
- Provide explicit examples of desired patterns in context
Key Relationships
- The fine-tune can't be changed by users
- Prompts have more immediate but less persistent influence
- Codebase patterns have the strongest long-term effect
- Larger codebases create stronger cultural imprinting
- Context window limitations determine which cultural elements are visible
Connections
- Related Concepts: Memento (context rebuilding), Requirements Not Solutions (explicit guidance)
- Broader Context: LLM Behavior Patterns (model tendencies)
- Applications: Codebase Standardization (creating consistent patterns)
References
- Edward Z. Yang (2025). "AI Blindspots" collection, March 2025.
#ai-behavior #prompt-engineering #codebase-management #culture
Connections:
Sources:
- From: AI Blindspots